Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Star Trek : Into Darkness



Bravo, Cumberbatch. Bravo.

Spoiler Alert

The role of Khan will not come to define the acting Benedict Cumberbatch (his role as Sherlock just might though), but what a solid performance. The rage, the paranoia, the megalomania, the elegance of his evil was well played. 

Two scenes encapsulate his turn as Kahn for me. One, his duel with Kirk while trapped in the brig. Scene the second, the vulnerability he displayed as he became more obsessed with saving his crew (his only weakness, besides the Vulcan Death grip, that became his undoing). Bravo Mr. Cumberbatch. Now, explain how you cheated death to defeat Moriarti.

The story that developed in Star Trek was unexpected. I can understand why hardcore Trekkers might be perturbed with J.J. Abrams choice of direction--twisting the storyline of what many feel is the best of the original Star Trek films. For my part, I was decidedly unperturbed (after all, my formative years followed the timeline of the release of the Star Wars prequels--nothing is sacred in fanboy fiction anymore). Though the tale was not one that would ever match Cumberbatch's Shakesperian delivery, I appreciated the tribute to the past. Admittedly, I did not see the final resolution (and perhaps the largest deviation from the original storyline) until the tribble twitched in the sickbay.

KAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHNNNNNNN!

It is dream of mine to one day have a reason to deliver that preceding line. I do not know if that day will ever come, but I will use Zachary Quinto's pronouncement as an inspiration.

Chris Pine may never be able to play any other role effectively but Captain James T. Kirk. I also doubt that his career will follow the long, winding path of he who preceded him in playing the role.

All signs point to a 3rd installment of this current crop of Star Trek films. The brief but impactful appearance by the Klingons during Into Darkness should provide enough of a launching board for a future plot.


Saturday, May 18, 2013

2013- NBA Eastern Conference Finals Preview

In five minutes....

Heat v. Pacers. I will not count out the Pacers. Lance Stephenson and Paul George are wings on the rise. Roy Hibbert has been a beast at the rim. George Hill running point. David West. Any one of these guys can rise up and have a good game. Ultimately, it will be the inability of any one of them to simply will their team that will be their undoing against the Heat. At this point, I don't believe you can count on them as a collective nor as individuals to guarantee that they will be at their best against the best team in the world, the Miami Heat.

That being said, there has not been as much as destiny and drama involved with the 2013 playoff run for the Miami Heat as there was during the 2012 campaign. They are likely just that good that they don't need any extra motivation. Correction, LeBron may just be that good. 

Though the feeling of inevitability is not as omnipresent as it was last season, the Heat will win this series against the Indiana Pacers in 6 games.

Friday, May 17, 2013

2013 - Western Conference Finals Preview

Five Minute Sports Report:

Spurs v. Grizzlies.

Watch out NBA fans, this could get ugly. It is nice to see a couple of small market teams make it to the Western Conference Finals. I'll take the Grizzlies in 6. Marc Gasol and Zach Randolph have the edge in the frontcourt. Mike Conley has proven himself to be no slouch this Playoff season. He will match up nicely with Tony Parker. Defensively, the Grizz should throw the Spurs off their game.

I do like the narrative of the Spurs on their last leg and defending the aging dynasty to the last man. I don't like it enough to pick them to win.

Media types may not like the matchup for its lack of drama. Serious hoops fans will appreciate the clash of styles and the exhausting battle that is about to ensue.

Again, Grizzlies in 6.